Fanatical football 1.7 mod mod#
I'm not saying either mod is wrong or out of line.Ī question I have - does brewerfan post anywhere who the mod for a forum is? i know who the mods are, but i don't really know which mod moderates which forum.Īnd i stilll blame rydogg for telling me to include some additional !!!!!! and #$%#% in my posts. I believe certain mods, just like referees, have different levels of tolerance.Ī poster can post one thing in one forum and get a little slack, but say the same thing in another and be edited for their actions. Or maybe more people just need to be reminded of that site, similar to how you promote whenever a football discussion emerges?Īs i said earlier, i think the mods and editors should discuss this offline.
For example, I minored in Religious Studies and love discussing different religions, especially their early history, so my X-Mas post was more of a history debate than religious (the thread was about your opinions, so I admit I did throw one in there that may have resulted in the thread being locked). The brewerfan political scene board ( /bbrewerf.icalscene) is still active, right? Would it be a good idea when discussions seem to be going in that direction for a mod to immediately close the thread and put the link for that board so that, if posters wish, they may continue their discussion completely off the brewerfan home board? I'm not sure how ezboard works, but would it even be possible to move the discussion (like how you can move from the OT forum to Issues - is it possible to move a thread from brewerfan OT to the brewerfan political scene board?)Īlthough I agree that political and religion topics are rarely discussed without becoming hostile and really have no place on a baseball message board, it would be nice to be able to have a venue for (hopefully) civilized discussion separate from this site. but personal attacks are also not appropriate. the best of intentions always ends up bad. I can understand why politics and religion subjects are not appropriate. I think the moderators should revist this issue outside this board to make sure they are all on the same page. but through our differences, we realized we both have a lot in common. he rubbed me the wrong way, and I replied in kind ten fold. i trust we have all learned something from that.
Fanatical football 1.7 mod free#
i was defending the rights of somebody else's free speech. but if tell brian he has bad taste in socks and pets, it will be my last post made. i know if i rip Al and call him a toyboy, nobody will do anything. however, when ripping a moderator or his post, there is always the fear that being banned will be the result. sometimes a moderator posts something that is out of line and he/she is deserving of being ripped. and yes, sometimes whether it be in fun or jest. We seem to have a different standard when we rip posters verses when we rip moderators. I also recall a poster who was mocking brian in an unpublished chat session two months ago, and he was banned imediately. and there was no action taken against those people who ripped Al. I also recall many people ripping Al saying he brings it on himself.
and nothing was ever done to those who mocked his posts. I recall a poster whose first name I believe was Clancy or something like that. However, there does seem to be a double standard about posts that insult or make fun of other posters. ( for new posters, this happened several years ago, and the situation was resolved.)
the posts were deleted without warning or private message. One of my biggest beefs in the past was when several of my posts were deleted.
0 kommentar(er)
